It was reported that a patient¿s posterior capsule was broken during implantation of an intraocular lens (iol).The iol was cut up for removal intraoperatively.The lens was exchanged for a lens of a different model and diopter.A vitrectomy was performed.The reporter is unsure why or how the capsule damage occurred, but states that there are no product quality concerns.The reporter does not have any information about the patient's current status.Though requested, no additional information was provided.
|
The product was not returned for evaluation; consequently, no product evaluation was performed.The complaint could not be confirmed.A device history record (dhr) review could not be completed as no lot number had been provided.Based upon the complaint trend review, the volume of complaints is within the acceptable control limits and no complaint trend is observed.The trend analysis, risk analysis and directions for use review are considered acceptable, with the product performing within anticipated rates.The root cause is unknown; however, the most probable root cause is operational context.Use of an insufficient volume of viscoelastic or not loading according to the directions for use (dfu) may result in leading haptics becoming straight during the advancement of the lens, which may result in haptic contact with the posterior capsular bag.It cannot be confirmed that the capsular damage occurred as a result of the device.All previous surgical steps including parasynthesis, capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification, and irrigation/aspiration can lead to tears in the posterior capsule.No corrective action is necessary at this time.
|