Catalog Number CFP001 |
Device Problem
Improper Flow or Infusion (2954)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/28/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The hardware investigation has begun but it has not been completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference # (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (afib) ablation procedure with a coolflow® irrigation pump and it was reported that the loaner coolflow® irrigation pump and a high flow rate deactivation problem occurred.It was reported that during the procedure, the coolflow® irrigation pump would freeze when trying to change the catheter flow.It was notes that it would not automatically deactivate the high flow from 17 ml to 2 ml after stopping the ablation.When changing manually it did change to 2 ml but then automatically went down to 0.Due to the harm this could cause, a nurse had to stand next to the pump to control it and change quickly.There was no patient consequence.No other information has been provided.The issue of high flow rate deactivation problem is considered an mdr reportable malfunction.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation summary.It was reported that a patient underwent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (afib) ablation procedure with a coolflow® irrigation pump and it was reported that the loaner coolflow® irrigation pump and a high flow rate deactivation problem occurred.It was reported that during the procedure, the coolflow® irrigation pump would freeze when trying to change the catheter flow.It was notes that it would not automatically deactivate the high flow from 17 ml to 2 ml after stopping the ablation.When changing manually it did change to 2 ml but then automatically went down to 0.There was no patient consequence.The device was evaluated, and no error was found.The device was performing within specification.The device was also subjected to preventative maintenance (pm), and safety and functional testing.All tests passed and there was no device malfunction found.The customer complaint was not confirmed.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and it was verified that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specifications and procedures.Manufacturer's reference # (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|