It was reported by the company representative that the neurologist had turned the patient's device off due to complaints of voice irritation and shortness of breath.The physician and patient agreed to schedule generator replacement for newer technology but also referred her for lead revision to ensure that the lead placement was sufficient.Clinic notes confirmed that the vns was disabled due to hoarseness and swallowing difficulties and chest pain.The patient's lead and generator were replaced.While performing the lead revision, the surgeon saw that the lead veered off from where he thought the lead should normally be placed.He believed it was possible that the lead was implanted on the wrong nerve and this was causing the patient's symptoms; although upon follow-up he indicated it could be possible that it was just placed on a different part of the vagus nerve.The surgeon reported that the revision had resolved the patient's concerns per the mother.When asked whether the surgery was for patient comfort or to preclude a serious injury, the physician indicated that it was for newer technology (note that the lead did not need to be replaced for newer technology.) no further relevant information has been received to date.Product return is not expected per the hospital protocol.
|