• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION COLONIC CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MQR STENT, COLONIC METALLIC EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION COLONIC CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MQR STENT, COLONIC METALLIC EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem Occlusion (1984)
Event Date 04/22/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
K163468 - 510 k # - (exact rpn known but all evo c stents approved under this number.).Cannot be confirmed that evo c stent was related to this adverse event.This is a conservative assessment investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
As per source doc: literature review title: ''endoscopic stenting for palliation of intra-abdominal gastrointestinal malignant obstruction: predictive factors for clinical success'' pais-cunha et al 2018.As per lit review this study aimed to analyse the factors predicting the effectiveness of stent placement in patients with gastrointestinal obstruction.It was a retrospective study that was carried out including 160 patients who underwent palliative stenting for intra-abdominal obstruction, technical and clinical success, stent dysfunction and adverse events were analysed.''we carried out a retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients undergoing either gastroduodenal or colorectal stent placement for the treatment of malignant intra-abdominal gastroduodenal or colonic obstruction in a tertiary-care medical centre (instituto português de oncologia do porto francisco gentil, e.P.E) between december 2012 and july 2017.'' 'in total, 160 patients had a palliative indication for stent placement and were considered for analysis'.Stent dysfunction occurred in 21 (13%) patients, seven (15%) patients who had undergone colorectal stent placement and 14 (13%) patients who had undergone gastroduodenal stent placement (p = 0.731).Migration was associated with short 6 cm stents (9 vs.2% p = 0.044).Of the 14 patients with stent restenosis, 11 patients had to receive a second stent: 2 colorectal stents.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k)#: k163468.Device evaluation: the evo stents of unknown lot number were not returned to cook ireland for evaluation.With the information provided, document based investigation was conducted.This file was created from the attached journal article to address 2 cases stent restenosis requiring second stent placement with colorectal stent.Documents review including ifu review: as the evo devices from unknown lot number, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.Prior to distribution all evo (evolution colonic stent ) devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.The instructions for use ifu0052-10 (evolution colonic stent) which informs the user about the potential complications "additional complications include, but are not limited to : perforation, hemorrhage, fever, infection, allergic reaction to medication, hypotension, respiratory depression or arrest, cardiac arrhythmia or arrest.Additional complications include but are not limited to: intestinal perforation, pain, inadequate stent expansion, stent misplacement and/or migration, tumor ingrowth or overgrowth, stent occlusion, ulcerations, pressure necrosis, erosion of the luminal mucosa, septicemia, foreign body sensation, bowel impaction, diarrhea, constipation, peritonitis, symptoms of tenesmus or urgency/incontinence, death (other than due to normal disease progression).There is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined due to limited information provided in this literature.A possible root cause could be attributed to patient condition related, as per instructions for use, tumor ingrowth or overgrowth, stent occlusion, are listed as a potential complications following the placement of this device.Summary: customer complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.The patient was requiring second stent placement.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.- attachment: [pais cunha et al 2018.Pdf].
 
Event Description
As per source doc: literature review title: ''endoscopic stenting for palliation of intra-abdominal gastrointestinal malignant obstruction: predictive factors for clinical success'' pais-cunha et al 2018.As per lit review this study aimed to analyse the factors predicting the effectiveness of stent placement in patients with gastrointestinal obstruction.It was a retrospective study that was carried out including 160 patients who underwent palliative stenting for intra-abdominal obstruction, technical and clinical success, stent dysfunction and adverse events were analysed.''we carried out a retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients undergoing either gastroduodenal or colorectal stent placement for the treatment of malignant intra-abdominal gastroduodenal or colonic obstruction in a tertiary-care medical centre (instituto português de oncologia do porto francisco gentil, e.P.E) between (b)(6)2012 and (b)(6) 2017.'' 'in total, 160 patients had a palliative indication for stent placement and were considered for analysis' stent dysfunction occurred in 21 (13%) patients, seven (15%) patients who had undergone colorectal stent placement and 14 (13%) patients who had undergone gastroduodenal stent placement (p = 0.731).Migration was associated with short 6 cm stents (9 vs.2% p = 0.044).Of the 14 patients with stent restenosis, 11 patients had to receive a second stent: 2 colorectal stents.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION COLONIC CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MQR STENT, COLONIC METALLIC EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
MDR Report Key9564615
MDR Text Key189317195
Report Number3001845648-2020-00018
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/22/2018
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/20/2019
Initial Date FDA Received01/08/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/20/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/08/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-