The contract manufacturer was notified of the reported complaint.However, as no lot number was provided, a review of the device history record, complaint history database, non-conformances and capas could not be completed.No components were received for evaluation as the device remains implanted.As examination of the components may not conclusively confirm or disprove the report of leakage quality accepts the physician's observations.
|
According to the available information, the altis was placed in (b)(6) 2019, and reported to have failed that same month.The patient was reported to have recovered without sequelae and the sling had been placed too loose (not tensioned enough).It was later reported the patient had a redo surgery because the patient wasn't dry.According to the coloplast territory manager, after going in and looking at the position of the sling it did not appear to be an issue with the sling, or placement of the sling.The physician felt the sling was a bit anterior and the patient had a long urethra which could have contributed to the issue.A non-coloplast device was placed on top of the altis.The altis was left untouched due to tissue ingrowth, and it was also reported that one sling was not wide enough to cover the areas needed to give the patient support.
|