Title : comparison between endoscope-assisted partial mastectomy with filling of dead space using absorbable mesh and conventional conservative method on cosmetic outcome in patients with stage i or ii breast cancermy.Studies comparing cosmetic outcome between conventional conservative method (ccm) and endoscope-assisted partial mastectomy (eapm) are scarce.A total of 111 patients with stage i or ii breast cancer who underwent ccm (51 patients; age: 11.4 years; bmi: 20.1 to 25.6) or eapm (60 patients; age: 12.5 years; bmi: 20.2 to 25.2) were reviewed and included in the study.During the ccm procedure, the surgical wound was closed by placing vicryl 3-0 subcutaneous sutures (ethicon).During the eapm procedure, vicryl mesh (ethicon) wrapped in interseed (ethicon) was used to fill the dead space.The number of meshes depended on the resection volume.The authors filled the mesh loosely until the operative-side breast was not dented in the supine position, and symmetry of both breasts was achieved.The surgical wound was closed by placing subcutaneous buried sutures using pds ii 5-0 clear (ethicon) and dermabond (ethicon).In the ccm group, reported complications included nipple deviation (n-26), breast atrophy (n-15), skin change (n-17), and scar (n-16).In the eapm group, reported complications included nipple deviation (n-35), breast atrophy (n-33), skin change (n-29), scar (n-33), and mesh infection (n-7).Eapm is superior to ccm for postoperative cosmetic outcome, in particular, with respect to atrophy and scar.Generally, a lower tumor location is associated with postoperative cosmetic outcome difficulties in bct, but in the study eapm significantly improved cosmetic outcome in location b compared with ccm.Studies with larger sample size are warranted to verify the findings in regards to its performance on tumor location.Prevention of mesh infection may further improve cosmetic outcome.
|