Model Number D138502 |
Device Problem
Material Perforation (2205)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/20/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The biosense webster, inc.Product analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium and the sheath was perforated by the dilator.It was reported that the dilator came out of the irrigation hole and dilated the irrigation hole.The carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium was replaced and the issue was resolved.The carto 3 system was operating per specifications and was not responsible for the product issue.They reported that the sheath has been determined to be the root cause of the complaint.The procedure was continued.There was no report of patient consequence.The perforation of the sheath by the dilator was assessed as a reportable malfunction.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation summary: it was reported that a patient underwent a paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium.It was reported that the dilator came out of the irrigation hole and dilated the irrigation hole.The carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium was replaced and the issue was resolved.The carto 3 system was operating per specifications and was not responsible for the product issue.They reported that the sheath has been determined to be the root cause of the complaint.The procedure was continued.There was no report of patient consequence.The device was visually inspected and one of the irrigation holes was found damaged.This damage occurred during the procedure.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed and no internal actions related to the reported complaint were identified.The customer complaint was confirmed.The root cause of the irrigation hole damage was related to the procedure since it was reported that the dilator came out of the irrigation hole.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
During the initial reported event, the dilator came out of the irrigation hole and dilated the irrigation hole.During the first visual performed by the biosense webster, inc.Product analysis lab, no visual damage or anomalies were observed on the device.During additional assessment on january 16, 2020, the biosense webster, inc.Product analysis lab noted that the device was found with the dilator inside.Visual inspection revealed a damaged irrigation hole.This finding remains reportable.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
During additional assessment, it was determined on august 14, 2020 that the most probable outcome of this failure mode is a procedure delay.Therefore, there was no risk to the patient.This event was reassessed from mdr reportable to not mdr reportable.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|