• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CAMERON HEALTH SQ-RX PULSE GENERATOR; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CAMERON HEALTH SQ-RX PULSE GENERATOR; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number 1010
Device Problems Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Inappropriate or Unexpected Reset (2959); Data Problem (3196)
Patient Problems No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/07/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received and is undergoing analysis.This report will be updated when analysis is complete.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) system received appropriate shocks for a ventricular tachycardia (vt)/ventricular fibrillation (vf).The first shock was successful but the arrhythmia recurred and the next shock did not convert.The field representative reported the patient received a third shock but no episode was stored.The patient was successfully resuscitated but remains in poor condition due to comorbidities following a kidney transplant.The patient is also awaiting a heart transplant.Interrogation of the device revealed a power supply (ps) and a lost template (lt) error code.Technical services reviewed the device data and confirmed that due to the power supply errors the device experienced resets, resulting in the last episode not getting stored.Device and electrode replacement was recommended, as the device resets would likely delay any shock therapy.X-rays were recommended to verify the position of the electrode; since the ps errors happened while shocking, it was suspected that contact between the electrode and the device had occurred and the electrode insulation was possibly compromised.The field representative later reported that the physician understood the system required replacement but no procedure would be performed until the patient's condition was improved.Approximately six weeks later, the s-icd system was explanted and replaced.The patient was in good condition.The explanted products were returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) system received appropriate shocks for a ventricular tachycardia (vt)/ventricular fibrillation (vf).The first shock was successful but the arrhythmia recurred and the next shock did not convert.The field representative reported the patient received a third shock but no episode was stored.The patient was successfully resuscitated but remains in poor condition due to comorbidities following a kidney transplant.The patient is also awaiting a heart transplant.Interrogation of the device revealed a power supply (ps) and a lost template (lt) error code.Technical services reviewed the device data and confirmed that due to the power supply errors the device experienced resets, resulting in the last episode not getting stored.Device and electrode replacement was recommended, as the device resets would likely delay any shock therapy.X-rays were recommended to verify the position of the electrode; since the ps errors happened while shocking, it was suspected that contact between the electrode and the device had occurred and the electrode insulation was possibly compromised.The field representative later reported that the physician understood the system required replacement but no procedure would be performed until the patient's condition was improved.Approximately six weeks later, the s-icd system was explanted and replaced.The patient was in good condition.The explanted products were returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received and is undergoing analysis.This report will be updated when analysis is complete.Patient code 3191 captures the reportable event of surgery.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, the device was thoroughly evaluated and analyzed.Visual inspection noted some tool marks on the device case.The seal plug was intact and the setscrew moved freely.The device was interrogated with a monitoring voltage of 8.774v and the remaining battery life to elective replacement indicator (eri) was 12%.The power supply (ps) and lost template (lt) error messages and the memory reset observed clinically were caused by a temporary interruption of power to the circuitry.Review of the device memory found on november 7, 2019 (the date of the event) the device became stuck in a loop for nine cycles, then the device began operating normally, where the device sensed arrhythmias and delivered therapy.In the laboratory, the device passed electrical testing.The device case was then removed for inspection of the internal components.Internal visual inspection noted a crack on the solder connection of the inline fuse on the battery assembly.Laboratory analysis concluded that this cracked solder caused the power interruption.Of note, this model device is no longer manufactured.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SQ-RX PULSE GENERATOR
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
CAMERON HEALTH
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
MDR Report Key9630289
MDR Text Key176387780
Report Number2124215-2019-28556
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P110042/S000
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/06/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/02/2015
Device Model Number1010
Device Catalogue Number1010
Device Lot NumberA017151
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/08/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/08/2019
Initial Date FDA Received01/25/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/04/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/06/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-