We have not received the complaint device for evaluation.Hence, we could not conclusively determine the root cause of the failure.During the phone conversation with the radiologist, he stated that the balloon was over-inflated to 1.5 ml by the operating surgeon which could have resulted in the balloon burst.He also tentatively stated that the burst resulted in the vessel injury.We have reached out to the radiologist multiple times for additional information.The radiologist stated that an internal investigation had been initiated at the hospital and he could not disclose any further information until the investigation is complete.At this time, we could not conclusively determine the root cause of the event.However, it is possible that the balloon rupture resulted due to user error since the operating surgeon overinflated the balloon to 1.5 ml against our recommended maximum inflation volume of 0.75 ml for the 4fr embolectomy catheter.Our ifu appropriately warns the users about the risks that could occur with the use of the embolectomy catheter including the risk of balloon rupture due to exposure to calcified plaque and overinflated balloon.To minimize the risk of vessel damage or balloon rupture, the maximum recommended inflation volume and pull force for the catheter should not be exceeded.The arterial embolectomy catheter is not recommended for the removal of fibrous, adherent or calcified material ( eg.Chronic clot, atherosclerotic plaque ).This catheter is not designed to withstand the additional pull force needed to remove these materials.
|