Section h10: (h3) the evaluation noted that the revision was most likely the result of prosthesis wear secondary to soft tissue laxity and possible implantation of the femoral component in internal rotation which likely contributed to larger than normal femoral-tibial rotation throughout the range of motion and increased medial compartment pressure during flexion that accelerated damage to the polyethylene insert.No information provided in the following section(s): a5, and b6.The following section(s) have additional info: a2, a3, a4, d10, g4, g7, h1, h2, h3, and h7.Section h11: corrections made in the following section(s): (g4) the awareness date in the initial submission should have been 20-jan-2020.
|