• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CEMENT; CEMENT, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CEMENT; CEMENT, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Inflammation (1932); Local Reaction (2035); Skin Irritation (2076); Swelling (2091); Shaking/Tremors (2515)
Event Date 10/31/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Pt called to report an adverse reaction to a cement used while getting a temporary crown.Pt stated that on (b)(6) 2019, she had her first appt for a temporary crown and believes she had a reaction to the cement used.Pt said she experienced small sores inside her mouth.Pt stated she went back on (b)(6) 2019, and the dental assistant told her they were going to give her stronger cement.Pt said her reaction got worse, inside her mouth was inflamed, the veins in her mouth became swollen, she was cold and shaky, and had chest pain.Pt suspects the cement is what caused her adverse reaction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CEMENT
Type of Device
CEMENT, DENTAL
MDR Report Key9699781
MDR Text Key179296326
Report NumberMW5092950
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EMA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/11/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/11/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-