Though requested, no additional information has been received.The product was not returned for evaluation; consequently, no product evaluation was performed.A device history review could not be performed as no lot number has been provided.Based upon the complaint trend review, the volume of complaints is within the acceptable control limits and no complaint trend is observed.The trend analysis, risk analysis and/or directions for use review were considered acceptable, with the product performing within anticipated rates.Proper loading of the intraocular lens (iol) in accordance with the directions for use is essential in facilitating the folding process of the iol.Incorrect loading can result in similar folding issues.In addition, the added viscoelastic (ovd) may also influence the folding of the iol.The iol may rub harder during advancing if too little viscoelastic is applied, or if zones of the loading chamber remain dry.Based on the current information, the root cause of the event could not be conclusively determined; however, user related factors, such as loading issues might have contributed to the event.No corrective action is necessary at this time.
|
It was reported that during the insertion of an intraocular lens (iol) there was a lens folding issue with the leading haptic.The incision was enlarged to remove the lens intraoperatively, and sutures were required.Though requested, no additional information has been received.
|
The capsular bag was damaged in the right eye, and there was a loss of vitreous.A vitrectomy was performed and the incision was enlarged to remove the intraocular lens (iol).Sutures were used.The iol damage was noticed intraoperatively.The plan of surgery was changed to 3 piece iol, and the second iol was implanted successfully.In the physician¿s opinion, the most likely cause of the iol damage was lens stuck in delivery device.Good patient prognosis.
|