Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary = > no device associated with this report was received for examination.A worldwide complaint database search found no other reported incident(s) against the provided product/lot combination(s) since release for distribution.Based on previous investigations this complication of joint replacement is unlikely to have been the result of a device failing to meet required specifications.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Corrective action was not indicated if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
The primary surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2013 via tha.It was confirmed that there was like tumor on the lateral side of femur recently, and although the patient was under observation, the patient had started to complain of pain.Thus, the revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2020 by replacing the stem (p/n: unknown), the head (p/n: unknown), the liner (p/n: unknown), the hole eliminator (p/n: unknown).It was judged that it was armd because the stem-neck junction had been discolored to black.The hip joint was filled with pseudotumor and it was scraped as much as possible.The tumor on the lateral side of femur was disappeared by scraping the pseudotumor.There was a possibility of the pseudotumor had been pushed from inside of the joint to the lateral part of the femur.The surgery was completed within a 30 minutes surgical delay.No further information is available.
|