Model Number 303-20 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Chest Pain (1776); Muscle Spasm(s) (1966); Seizures (2063); Neck Pain (2433)
|
Event Date 04/30/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient is referred for replacement due to the vns causing severe shaking and the patient cannot tolerate it.The patient previously complained of painful stimulation in the neck and chest which appears to now be related to the reason for the patient's referral.She noted discomfort up the middle of the chest in which she uses the magnet to turn off the device.The patient reported she is bothered by her vns and feels that it is misfiring and going up her chest rather than on the side of her neck.She cannot tolerate the device being set at 1.0 ma or higher no known surgery has occurred to date.No additional information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Product analysis for the lead was completed and approved.Note that since a significant portion of the lead (including the electrode array) was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.No anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.Product analysis for the generator completed and approved.In the pa lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the pulse generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
|
|
Event Description
|
The lead and generator were received for analysis.Analysis is currently underway but has not been completed and approved to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient underwent a full replacement.Data was received and reviewed for the patient's explanted devices.After review of the m105 decoder, it was found that the patient has had intermittent high impedance since (b)(6) 2019.Therefore, the patient¿s past reports of increase in seizures in (b)(6) 2020 previously reported in 1644487-2020-00109 and previous issues of painful stimulation, and muscle spasms (from (b)(6) 2019 continuing into 2020) were most likely all contributed from the patient¿s intermittent high lead impedance.From report #1644487-2020-00109: patient reported being in the emergency room due to 2 episodes during which the patient felt like she was having a seizure or stroke.The patient reported that she put the magnet over the generator and this stopped the event.Further information was received that the patient¿s device was disabled.A ct scan was performed and no stroke was observed on the scan.The emergency room doctor reported that he felt the cause of the event was the device.It was further noted that the patient does not have epilepsy or seizures.The explanted devices have not been received for analysis to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from the patient noting that she had a cap on her tooth in the past and was experiencing a shocking feeling because the vns was higher in her body and she believed the cap was interacting with the vns.As the patient was convinced this was the cause of her pain she asked her dentist to remove the cap and once removed she claims the pain went away.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|