• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem Reaction (2414)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
She put it directly on her skin and she has a really bad reaction [device use error].Case narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer reporting for herself.This female consumer of an unspecified age started to use thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwrap) (device lot number and expiration date not reported) from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.Relevant medical history and the relevant concomitant medications were unknown at the time of this report.Consumer reported it was entirely her fault but she had a reaction to the wrap.Consumer stated she put wrap directly on her skin and she had a really bad reaction.Consumer reported she did not know what to put on it and she would like to know how to treat this reaction.Consumer stated making a mess and she should rather go to the emergency room.Action taken with the thermacare therapy in response to the event and the outcome of the event were unknown at the time of this report.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event "she put it directly on her skin and she has a really bad reaction" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.Comment: based on the information provided, the event "she put it directly on her skin and she has a really bad reaction" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] she put it directly on her skin and she has a really bad reaction [device use error] ,.Case narrative:this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer reporting for herself.This female consumer of an unspecified age started to use thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwrap) (device lot number and expiration date not reported) from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.Relevant medical history and the relevant concomitant medications were unknown at the time of this report.Consumer reported it was entirely her fault but she had a reaction to the wrap.Consumer stated she put wrap directly on her skin and she had a really bad reaction.Consumer reported she did not know what to put on it and she would like to know how to treat this reaction.Consumer stated making a mess and she should rather go to the emergency room.Action taken with the thermacare therapy in response to the event and the outcome of the event were unknown at the time of this report.According to product quality complaint: reasonably suggest device malfunction was yes and severity of harm was s3.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Follow-up ((b)(6) 2020): new information received from a product quality complaint group includes: manufacturing site severity and malfunction assessment provided., comment: based on the information provided, the event "she put it directly on her skin and she has a really bad reaction" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Site sample status is not received.Summary of investigation is as follows: this investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8 hour product.Conclusion is as follows: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event/serious/unknown.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assmt.& rationale is that lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] she put it directly on her skin and she has a really bad reaction [device use error].Case narrative:this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer reporting for herself.This female consumer of an unspecified age started to use thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwrap) (device lot number and expiration date not reported) from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.Relevant medical history and the relevant concomitant medications were unknown at the time of this report.Consumer reported it was entirely her fault but she had a reaction to the wrap.Consumer stated she put wrap directly on her skin and she had a really bad reaction.Consumer reported she did not know what to put on it and she would like to know how to treat this reaction.Consumer stated making a mess and she should rather go to the emergency room.Action taken with the thermacare therapy in response to the event and the outcome of the event were unknown at the time of this report.According to product quality complaint: reasonably suggest device malfunction was yes and severity of harm was s3.According to product quality complaint group on (b)(6) 2020: site sample status is not received.Summary of investigation is as follows: this investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) 8 hour product.Conclusion is as follows: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event/serious/unknown.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assmt.& rationale is that lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.Follow-up (10feb2020): new information received from a product quality complaint group includes: manufacturing site severity and malfunction assessment provided.Follow-up (02mar2020): follow-up attempts completed.No further information expected.Follow-up (25mar2020): new information received from product quality complaint group includes: investigation results.Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected., comment: based on the information provided, the event "she put it directly on her skin and she has a really bad reaction" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.No remedial action/corrective action/field safety corrective action is suggested at this time.Product effect varies with each individual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE HEATWRAP
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
MDR Report Key9728374
MDR Text Key189453220
Report Number1066015-2020-00042
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/05/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/19/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/28/2020
04/09/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-