Catalog Number 8065977763 |
Device Problem
Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
|
Patient Problem
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
|
Event Date 02/12/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation summary: the product was not returned for analysis.The product history and batch records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.The product investigation could not identify a root cause.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A health professional reported that during an intraocular lens (iol) implant surgery, the cartridge was rinsed with by the nurse and then filled with provisc (room temperature).The lens was then inserted by the sales representative with company tweezers and then the cartridge with lens was inserted into the injector.The cartridge was docked at the tunnel, the lens could be pushed forward slightly at first, then had great resistance.Suddenly the lens had uncontrolled shooting into the eye.The lens was stuck in the chamber angle where only the end of the haptic was visible.After pulling the lens out of the chamber angle, the patient experienced iris bleeding and iridodialysis.The surgeon then noticed that the cartridge had burst.The surgery was completed with a backup lens without further complications.The sight and health of the patient was not impaired.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected information provided in h.10.The original g4 date reported was (b)(6) 2020 which is not correct per the corrected information received.The new date of first receipt is (b)(6) 2020.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information provided in d.10., h.3., h.6., and h.10.Product evaluation: the used company iii (d) cartridge was returned.Viscoelastic is observed in the cartridge.The cartridge nozzle has three radiating cracks.As nozzle damage progresses to the thinner cartridge tip it causes the tip to split through to the end.The company iii (d) cartridge was cleaned for further evaluation.Top coat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.Product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.The associated products are qualified.The root cause for the reported events could not be determined.Information was provided that the cartridge was rinsed before adding the viscoelastic.Rinsing the cartridge is not a step in the dfu.This may have caused the viscoelastic to be diluted.The company iii (d) cartridge had excessive damage.The comapny iii (d) cartridge damage on the top of the nozzle started in the thick wall cone area.Unusually high internal forces would be needed to create damage in this area.The two distinct areas of damage would indicate a progressive change that occurred as the lens was advanced.This type of damage typically occurs if the lens is not positioned correctly for advancement; if there is a lack of viscoelastic between the lens and the nozzle lumen; if the lens is advanced too rapidly or if the plunger is not positioned correctly at the trailing optic edge.If the plunger is not positioned at the trailing optic edge it can allow the lens to fold around the plunger tip making it too large to correctly advance through the narrow tip of the nozzle, which could cause damage to the tip or the lens.Top coat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|