• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40(TM). SHORT FEMORAL; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40(TM). SHORT FEMORAL; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 0580-1-044
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Ossification (1428); Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Injury (2348); Hip Fracture (2349)
Event Date 01/20/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the exeter stem was revised.Reason for revision: broken stem with resultant periprosthetic femoral fracture- severe pain and unable to weight bear.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed by medical review and inspection of the returned device method & results: -device evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 11 may 2020.This inspection indicated."the devices were examined with the aid of a stereo microscope at magnifications up to 50x.The head and proximal portion of the stem were returned in the assembled condition.Nothing noteworthy was observed on the returned head.The returned stem was returned in the fractured condition.Damage consistent with the cement mantle breakdown process was observed on the stem.Damage consistent with explantation process was also observed on the stem.The fracture surface was obscured by post fracture abrasion as well as explantation damage.The fracture initiated on the lateral surface and propagated medially.The proximal portion of the stem was analyzed further using a scanning electron microscope." dimensional inspection and functional inspection: not performed as the reported device was implanted and subsequently explanted.The device was returned damaged and in its current condition would not be an accurate reflection of its original manufactured condition.Material analysis a material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: "the returned stem had fractured in fatigue; with the fracture propagating medially.Damage consistent with the cement mantle breakdown process was observed on the stem.Xrf showed that the stem and head chemistries were consistent with an astm f1586 alloys.The stem alloy was consistent with its respective drawing, no catalog number was provided for the returned head.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the stem surfaces examined." a review of the provided medical records and/or x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: "the likely cause of this event was an inevitable fatigue fracture of the stem after cyclic loading at the junction of the fixed and loose segments of the stem.Examination of the explanted stem and its fracture surfaces could confirm this mechanism and rule out factors associated with implant manufacturing or materials as having contributed to this clinical event." -device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: the returned stem had fractured in fatigue; with the fracture propagating medially.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes, x-rays are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the exeter stem was revised.**update** reason for revision: broken stem with resultant periprosthetic femoral fracture- severe pain and unable to weight bear.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXETER V40(TM). SHORT FEMORAL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
MDR Report Key9756558
MDR Text Key184424576
Report Number0002249697-2020-00394
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier04546540509048
UDI-Public04546540509048
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K173499
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number0580-1-044
Device Catalogue Number0580-1-044
Device Lot NumberG6166211
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/23/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/28/2020
Initial Date FDA Received02/26/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/22/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/16/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient Weight33
-
-