Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed by medical review and inspection of the returned device method & results: -device evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 11 may 2020.This inspection indicated."the devices were examined with the aid of a stereo microscope at magnifications up to 50x.The head and proximal portion of the stem were returned in the assembled condition.Nothing noteworthy was observed on the returned head.The returned stem was returned in the fractured condition.Damage consistent with the cement mantle breakdown process was observed on the stem.Damage consistent with explantation process was also observed on the stem.The fracture surface was obscured by post fracture abrasion as well as explantation damage.The fracture initiated on the lateral surface and propagated medially.The proximal portion of the stem was analyzed further using a scanning electron microscope." dimensional inspection and functional inspection: not performed as the reported device was implanted and subsequently explanted.The device was returned damaged and in its current condition would not be an accurate reflection of its original manufactured condition.Material analysis a material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: "the returned stem had fractured in fatigue; with the fracture propagating medially.Damage consistent with the cement mantle breakdown process was observed on the stem.Xrf showed that the stem and head chemistries were consistent with an astm f1586 alloys.The stem alloy was consistent with its respective drawing, no catalog number was provided for the returned head.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the stem surfaces examined." a review of the provided medical records and/or x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: "the likely cause of this event was an inevitable fatigue fracture of the stem after cyclic loading at the junction of the fixed and loose segments of the stem.Examination of the explanted stem and its fracture surfaces could confirm this mechanism and rule out factors associated with implant manufacturing or materials as having contributed to this clinical event." -device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: the returned stem had fractured in fatigue; with the fracture propagating medially.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes, x-rays are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|