H3 the product analysis result indicates that the cutting tips from both burs were not attached and not returned which would have resulted in the reported event.The distal end of the outer assemblies were both deformed in the same relative direction and 1 had the inner bushing dislodged which is an indication of aggressive use.Both burs were destructively disassembled for additional analysis.Although the distal end of the shaft assemblies were not returned, they would have measured approximately 5.11¿ and 4.80¿ from tip to break point based off the location of the breaks.The break point corresponds to the proximal side of the outer tube radius where the diameter of the inner shaft is 0.024¿.When viewed under magnification, the fracture contained circular patterns and the high points were worn down which most likely indicates torsional overload caused the break and continued rotation caused the wear.The manufacturing instructions require a pull test on the bur head which would likely have detected this issue if present during production.There was no allegation of a defect prior to use.This event includes 2 burs from the same lot number breaking during use; a review of the global complaint data showed no other complaints for this lot number; this is the second similar complaint from this facility for the same part number within 6 months.The information most likely indicates erratic torsional loads due to aggressive use.The ifu warns the user not use excessive force to pry or push bone with the attachment or tool during dissection, this could cause the tool to break.H6: additional information suggest that fdm 4114 , fdr 3221 and fdc 67 are no longer applicable to this event.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|