• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LEMAITRE VASCULAR, INC. SINGLE LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LEMAITRE VASCULAR, INC. SINGLE LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 1601-48
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 01/28/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
We have received the catheter as well as the dislodged catheter tip for evaluation.The catheter broke just below the proximal ligature.The distal end of the catheter shaft where it separated was observed to have stretched extensively.The last 8 cm stretched to 18 cm ( 44% elongation).As a result, the inflation hole was completely occluded.The proximal ligature was partially undone but did not show any sign of slippage.The distal ligature remained intact and properly secured to the shaft of the catheter.During our follow-up conversation with the contact person at the hospital, we learned that the malfunction occurred during the second pass.Surgeon was unable to deflate the balloon when he attempted to remove the catheter from the patient's vessel.The contact person also stated that the pictures from the angiogram taken prior to the surgery did not show extensive calcification or stenosis in the patient's artery.She could not confirm if the catheter was used to remove a fresh clot or an adherent mature clot.Based on our device evaluation, it is likely that some procedural factors ( use of excessive force to remove the clot) may have contributed to this malfunction.The necking of the catheter shaft that we observed in this catheter likely resulted due to excessive force that was exerted when removing the clot which blocked the inflation lumen and prevented the balloon from deflating.As surgeon exerted additional force to remove this undeflated balloon from the vessel, it likely resulted in the tip separation.Our review of the lot history records for this lot did not find any discrepancies either in the manufacturing or packaging process that could be related to this incident.Further, we have not received any other complaints of a similar nature for devices from this lot.As part of our manufacturing process, a 100% balloon and winding inspection are performed on each of the manufactured product to ensure each catheter operates properly.We have performed a pull test on a sample of units from this lot number during our in-process inspection.All of those units passed the test requirements when the balloons were pull tested to their validated force.Our ifu appropriately warns the users about the risks that could occur with the use of the embolectomy catheter including the risk of tip separation.The arterial embolectomy catheter is not recommended for the removal of fibrous, adherent or calcified material ( eg.Chronic clot, atherosclerotic plaque ).This catheter is not designed to withstand the additional pull force needed to remove these materials.As of the latest information received on 30/01/2020, patient was still at hospital, but doing well with no signs of complication from the malfunction.
 
Event Description
During thrombectomy in superficial femoral artery, catheter tip dislodged from the catheter shaft during removal of residual thrombi from the patient's vessel.The malfunction occurred during second pass.Surgeon was able to remove the catheter tip from the patient's vessel.The malfunction extended operating time period but did not result in any patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Type of Device
EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
LEMAITRE VASCULAR, INC.
63 second ave
burlington, ma
Manufacturer (Section G)
LEMAITRE VASCULAR, INC.
63 second ave
burlington, ma
Manufacturer Contact
pragya thikey
63 second ave
burlington, ma 
2212266152
MDR Report Key9770750
MDR Text Key188405342
Report Number1220948-2020-00024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00840663100491
UDI-Public00840663100491
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K992368
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/28/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number1601-48
Device Catalogue Number1601-48
Device Lot NumberSLC4825
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/14/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/29/2020
Initial Date FDA Received02/28/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/29/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention; Disability;
-
-