ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CENTURION VISION SYSTEM, ACCESSORY, OZIL TORSIONAL HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 8065750469 |
Device Problem
Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure (3023)
|
Patient Problems
Corneal Edema (1791); Irritation (1941); Eye Burn (2523)
|
Event Date 01/29/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation, including root cause analysis, is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A surgeon reported a patient experienced a corneal burn during a cataract procedure.The surgeon filled the anterior chamber with viscoelastic, started sculpting and immediately it appeared dusty, smoky and milky at the tip.Phacoemulsification seemed ineffective.The surgeon stopped and checked to make sure everything was okay, then resumed sculpting.Again, the surgeon noticed that phacoemulsification seemed ineffective.The surgeon stopped and observed a corneal incision contracture.The surgeon removed the phacoemulsification handpiece from the eye a third time to check to make sure everything was okay.He noted that there was no signal from the device.The surgeon flushed out the healon v with regular healon, continued phacoemulsification with the same handpiece and was able to proceed as expected.The cataract was removed and an intraocular lens was implanted.There was a classic fish mouth appearance at the incision site which required sutures.The surgeon indicated that the patient may develop astigmatism post-operatively and will need to be monitored.The surgeon indicated that his theory is the event had to do with the viscoelastic however, two handpieces will be returned for evaluation.It is unknown which handpiece was used during the event.Additional information was received indicating that the patient returned on (b)(6) 2020 for postoperative evaluation.The patient presented with corneal edema, edema around the incision area.The patient reported irritation from the sutures.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The phacoemulsification (phaco) handpiece was received and a visual assessment of the returned phaco handpiece found no visual nonconformities.The returned phaco handpiece was connected to a calibrated infiniti vision system.The phaco handpiece tuned successfully and completed a five-minute burn-in test with the system set at 100% ultrasonic and torsional power.The phaco handpiece was connected to dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements, which found the phaco handpiece to meet product specifications.The phaco handpiece manufacturing device history record (dhr) was reviewed.Based on assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The phaco handpiece was found to meet specifications; therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.Corneal burn is an issue that is occasionally reported with cataract surgery.According to the pennsylvania patient safety advisory abstract: preventing corneal burns during phacoemulsification, march 2010, vol.7, no.1: 23-25, most corneal burns can be traced to issues related to surgical technique and not to malfunctioning equipment.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|