• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS HBSAG REAGENT PACK; IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS HBSAG REAGENT PACK; IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6801322
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/31/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that discordant negative vitros (b)(6) results were obtained from a single patient sample.The results were considered discordant compared to positive (b)(6) results obtained from non-vitros methods.A definitive cause of the discordant vitros results was not established.However, a sample related issue likely contributed to the event.It is possible that a mutant (b)(6) strain not detected by the vitros reagent assays was present in the patient sample.The vitros (b)(6) ifu states that in rare cases (b)(6) tests do not detect certain hbv mutant strains.Based on historical quality control results, a vitros (b)(6) lot 8525 performance issue is not a likely contributor to the event.Additionally, ongoing tracking and trending of complaint data has not identified any signals to suggest there is a systemic quality issue with vitros (b)(6) lot 8525.There was no indication that the vitros 3600 immunodiagnostic system malfunctioned.However, as no precision testing was conducted around the time of the event to verify instrument performance, an instrument issue cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event.In addition, ortho was unable to determine whether the customer was following the sample collection device manufacturer¿s recommendations for sample centrifugation, therefore inappropriate pre-analytical sample handling could not be completely ruled out as contributing to the discordant results.It is possible that cellular debris, due to poor sample preparation, was present in the affected sample, although this could not be confirmed.
 
Event Description
A customer contacted the ortho clinical diagnostics (ortho) technical solutions center (tsc) to report discordant negative results obtained from a patient sample using vitros immunodiagnostic products (b)(6) reagent on a vitros 3600 immunodiagnostic system.Vitros (b)(6) results of 0.13 and 0.13 s/c (non-reactive) versus the expected result of reactive.Biased results of the magnitude and direction observed may lead to inappropriate physician action if they were to occur undetected on patient samples.The discordant negative vitros (b)(6) results were reported from the laboratory.The clinician was aware of the patient's active disease status and requested additional testing.A corrected report was later issued.Ortho has not been made aware of any allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.This report corresponds to ortho clinical diagnostics inc.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS HBSAG REAGENT PACK
Type of Device
IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
100 indigo creek drive
rochester NY 14626
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
felindre meadows
pencoed
bridgend, wales CF35 5PZ
UK   CF35 5PZ
Manufacturer Contact
james a stevens
100 indigo creek drive
rochester, NY 14626
5854533000
MDR Report Key9777462
MDR Text Key224676119
Report Number3007111389-2020-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/02/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/16/2020
Device Catalogue Number6801322
Device Lot Number8525
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/03/2020
Initial Date FDA Received03/02/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/12/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-