The investigation determined that discordant negative vitros (b)(6) results were obtained from a single patient sample.The results were considered discordant compared to positive (b)(6) results obtained from non-vitros methods.A definitive cause of the discordant vitros results was not established.However, a sample related issue likely contributed to the event.It is possible that a mutant (b)(6) strain not detected by the vitros reagent assays was present in the patient sample.The vitros (b)(6) ifu states that in rare cases (b)(6) tests do not detect certain hbv mutant strains.Based on historical quality control results, a vitros (b)(6) lot 8525 performance issue is not a likely contributor to the event.Additionally, ongoing tracking and trending of complaint data has not identified any signals to suggest there is a systemic quality issue with vitros (b)(6) lot 8525.There was no indication that the vitros 3600 immunodiagnostic system malfunctioned.However, as no precision testing was conducted around the time of the event to verify instrument performance, an instrument issue cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event.In addition, ortho was unable to determine whether the customer was following the sample collection device manufacturer¿s recommendations for sample centrifugation, therefore inappropriate pre-analytical sample handling could not be completely ruled out as contributing to the discordant results.It is possible that cellular debris, due to poor sample preparation, was present in the affected sample, although this could not be confirmed.
|