Date of event: unknown, information not provided.If explanted, give date: not applicable due to lens has not been explanted.Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed as the lens remains implanted, the product was not returned.The reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no other complaints were received for this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.Note: the device was manufactured at the kulim site which has been closed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
Additional information: section d10: device available for evaluation, yes.Section d10: returned to manufacturer on, 03/16/2019.Section h3: device returned to manufacturer: yes.With the return of the device explant of the device the planned explant has taken place, therefore section b2 is now updated to required intervention, and patient code 3191-explant is being entered.Section b2: required intervention to prevent permanent impairment/damage.Section h6: patient code 3191 - explant.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection with the unaided eye revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics, and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.Based on the return condition of the lens no product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency was identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|