Explant date: if explanted, give date: not applicable, remains implanted in the eye.(b)(6).(b)(4).Device evaluation: product evaluation cannot be performed as per the initial report, the lens remains implanted.There are multiple factors that could contribute to the reported lens calculation issue, including but not limited too, user error.Without further information provided the complaint issue reported could not be verified and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search revealed that no other complaints have been received for this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
It was reported that the (b)(6) jnj calculation service mistakenly swapped the axes when calculating the toric iol.Additional information was provided stating the physician will rotate the lens.Further information provided confirmed the lens was rotated.Pre-op the patient was -14,5 +5,75 cylinder 120, post rotation the patient¿s vision in right eye is at 0,6.Remaining astigmatism +1,0/70 degrees.Explant is not necessary.No further information provided.
|