The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) using an indigo system separator 6 (sep6), indigo system aspiration catheter 6 (cat6), and non-penumbra sheath.It was reported that the patient had a heavy thrombus burden.During the procedure, the physician completed three to four passes in the target vessel using the sep6 , cat6, and sheath.Upon removal, the sep6 started to unravel two inches back from the bulb.The entire sep6 was then removed.It was noted that the physician experienced resistance on all passes due to the thrombus burden.The procedure was completed using another sep6 and the same cat6 and sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|