Model Number TABLETOP |
Device Problems
Decrease in Pressure (1490); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/25/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation, including root cause analysis, is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A healthcare professional reported an iop compensation issue with the system during a vitrectomy procedure.There was a decrease of the pressure.In response, the surgeon increased the intraocular pressure and decreased aspiration.The procedure was completed.The patient experienced a choroidal detachment.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received indicating that the issue occurs randomly; it occurs at the beginning, in the middle or at the end of the procedure.Iop compensation is activated but shuts itself off during the procedure for several seconds.This is noticed by the surgeon when the eye becomes soft.The surgeon discontinues suction and then the iop compensation reactivates on its own.Hypotony lasts a few seconds.There have been no long-term clinical consequences.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The system was examined and the reported ¿iop issue¿ was replicated.The fluidics was replaced to resolve the issue.The system was tested and found to meet product specifications.The manufacturing device history record (dhr) was reviewed.Based on assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The root cause of the iop issue can be attributed to the nonconforming fluidics.Based on the information obtained, the root cause of the reported patient impact cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected and additional information has been provided in h.6 and h.10.The system was examined and the reported system message (sm) was confirmed (via event log review) but was not replicated.However, as a preventive measure the fluidics was replaced.The system was tested and found to meet product specifications.At some point, the surgeon asked for a demo unit to be brought in and used to alleviate reoccurrences.Additionally, the settings were then reset to default, as a preventive measure.The system was found to have no problem.Therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Further information was received indicating that priming was completed before the procedure began.There is no indication of the tubing being kinked, modified or taped to something.No blockages or flow issues were observed with tubing.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|