Litigation alleges that the patient suffers from damage to his joints and body.Update: 07/15/2013 pfs was received from legal, medical records were received from legal, and part/ lot information was identified by invoice search.Records are available for further review.Corrected: doi: (b)(6) 2009.(right hip); doi: (b)(6) 2009; (left hip).Update ad 27 jul 2018: (b)(4) has been re-opened under (b)(4) due to the receipt of ppf and sticker sheets record.In addition to what were previously alleged, ppf alleges metal wear and metallosis.Added account name, facility name, age, revision date, patient code, associated contacts, products expiration and udi.Corrected patient identifier and event date.Doi: (b)(6) 2009.Dor: (b)(6) 2012, (right hip).Patient is bilateral, please see (b)(4) for the left hip.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : investigative update: 20 / august / 2021.Patient x-ray images have been provided for review.The acetabular cup has been added to this report.No device associated with this report was received for examination.Provided x-ray images are paper copies within patient medical records.That being noted nothing indicative of a product problem is identified.No gross malpositioning can be confirm using these paper copies.No conclusions can be drawn or root cause for the problems reported identified using the provided images.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the material, manufacturing, inspection or sterile processing that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|