• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SPECTRANETICS ANGIOSCULPT PTCA SCORING BALLOON CATHETER (RX); ANGIOSCULPT RX PTCA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SPECTRANETICS ANGIOSCULPT PTCA SCORING BALLOON CATHETER (RX); ANGIOSCULPT RX PTCA Back to Search Results
Model Number 2200-3015
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problems Apnea (1720); Pneumonia (2011); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 02/28/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient's dob or age at time of event, and weight are unknown.This information was not available from the facility.During withdrawal, the angiosculpt device separated in two pieces.Additional intervention was performed for removal with no success, thus the distal portion of the device was retained in the patient.The angiogram was received on 03/13/2020.Review of the angiogram revealed an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (icd) in the heart (possibly a biventricular icd).The coronary angiogram presented a moderately calcified lad with a severe mid lesion, non-dominant left circumflex (lcx), and diffuse calcific disease of the dominant right coronary artery (rca).There was no ventriculography (lv gram) done.The mid lad lesion was predilated with a workhorse balloon, which showed a significant waist in the balloon during inflation, with eventual rupture of the balloon.After the predilatation, there was a non-flow limited dissection in the proximal part of the lesion, which did not inhibit passage of the angiosculpt balloon.It appears that the angiosculpt was inflated several times within the original lesion.Finally it appears that the angiosculpt was stuck in the proximal lad (proximal to the lesion).The last image had an unknown radio-opaque density in the guiding catheter (possibly a snare).Patient information regarding relevant tests/laboratory data is unknown.This information was not available from the facility.The angiosculpt device was returned taped to an unused angiosculpt device.The complaint device was returned without the entire distal assembly (distal tip, distal bond, balloon, scoring element, marker bands, intermediate bond, inner member, transition tubing, rx port (support tubing), support wire, proximal bond, distal shaft, and part of the intermediate shaft).The distal assembly portion of the device that was not returned is approximately 29 cm (11 inches).The returned portion includes a part of intermediate shaft, hypotube, core wire, strain relief, and luer.The hypotube was bent likely due to packaging for device return.The device separated approximately 108 cm from the breaking point (core wire) to the distal end of the strain relief.The overall catheter working length spec is 137 cm +/- 3 cm.During withdrawal, it is probable that the degree of force applied by the user may have caused or contributed to the device separation.Per the ifu, retained device component is listed as a possible adverse effect of the procedure.
 
Event Description
The patient was admitted with sleep apnea, pneumonia, made enzymes, and diagnosed with severe mid lad disease.The physician predilated the lesion with an apex balloon.To make it "look nicer," an angiosculpt device was advanced with no problem maneuvering the balloon down to the mid lad.The balloon was inflated multiple times below rbp (18 atm), with no issues.During withdrawal, the balloon got stuck in the proximal lad and not in the original lesion.No stent was present in the proximal lad with not much calcium observed.The physician moved the guiding catheter up to the balloon, tugged it 2-3 times with slight resistance, along with several inflation, but the device separated in 2 pieces and retained in the patient.The patient went into surgery and got a bypass to the lad.Due to the sleep apnea and pneumonia, the patient got tracheal post-op.Upon removal of the proximal shaft, the physician compared it to an unused angiosculpt device to measure the length of the retained portion.The physician believed the device separated at the distal transition point, and approximately 6-7 inches was retained in the body.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANGIOSCULPT PTCA SCORING BALLOON CATHETER (RX)
Type of Device
ANGIOSCULPT RX PTCA
Manufacturer (Section D)
SPECTRANETICS
5055 brandin court
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer (Section G)
SPECTRANETICS
5055 brandin court
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
ana tan
5055 brandin court
fremont, CA 94538
510933-798
MDR Report Key9894900
MDR Text Key185505090
Report Number3005462046-2020-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NWX
UDI-Device Identifier00813132021214
UDI-Public00813132021214
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,03/03/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/19/2022
Device Model Number2200-3015
Device Catalogue Number2200-3015
Device Lot NumberG19110022
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/13/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/03/2020
Initial Date FDA Received03/28/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/19/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-