(b)(4).Batch # t5ck1a.Additional information was requested but not available: were there any patient consequences reported? if yes please describe.Can you please clarify the event of ¿no knife advancement¿? did the device deliver any staples? if yes, was the staple line complete? did the device cut? if yes, was the cut line complete? was there any difficulty opening the device? if yes, how was the device removed from the patient? device analysis: the analysis found that one sr75 reload was returned with no apparent damage.The reload was received with the knife not completely within the doghouse, the proximal 39 drivers up, the remaining drivers were down with staples present, and the swing tab was in the unlocked position.The cartridge was tested for functionality with a test device and fired without any difficulties.The staple line and cut line were complete and the staples met the staple form release criteria.The swing tab in unlocked position is consistent with an improper loading technique.A probable cause for the reported incident is that the device may have been partially fired, causing the lockout to be set.It is possible that the knife exposure on the reload is consist with the firing knob not being returned completely prior to opening the device, causing the knife to not returned completely to its home position.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device and the manufacturing criteria were met prior to the release of this lot/batch.
|