• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP INC. PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM; LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, GYNECOLOGIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP INC. PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM; LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, GYNECOLOGIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 8360-10
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problems Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Although the batch number was not provided, the supplier was identified as teleflex medical.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report, if available.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was an intraoperative issue with a prestige grasper, as per information received via medwatch (b)(4).During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure, the device tip bent while it was inside the patient.It was pulled out of the trocar and would not fit back into it.Once everything was pulled out together, it "broke." an x-ray confirmed that there were no retained objects.The malfunction occurred in (b)(6) 2020.Additional information was not provided.
 
Event Description
No update required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information - block d4 (udi), d7a, d8, d9.Manufacturer evaluation: the complaint device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.However, aesculap in partnership with the contract manufacturer have previously investigated and addressed similar issues of this nature (distal brazefailure/breakage).Previous investigations performed for similar failure modes revealed the following.The supplier reviewed the work instructions (wi) for the tube sub assembly test procedure wi, the brazing procedure wi, and the brazed joint buffing wi and identified improvement opportunities.While the tube subassembly joint is 100% percent tested with a torsional force, there was no requirement for applying a bending force to the joint.Therefore, a manual bend test was added to the wi.Additionally, a review of the torque test fixture and accompanying wi, noted the potential for the tube to slip inside the collet during inspections allowing for a defective part to potentially pass this test.The tube sub assembly test procedure was further updated to note this potential failure mode and to define the process for cleaning the parts and fixture/collet with alcohol prior to use.A review of the brazing procedure wi revealed that the glass tube was too short to effectively seal the brazing area off from the surrounding environment.Without a proper seal the brazing area could have insufficient argon present to facilitate effective brazing.The brazing procedure wi was updated to include a check for this condition prior to brazing.Additionally, the supplier updated the wi to optimize the order of operations of when flux is applied, the soldering ring is assembled, and the tube is loaded.This change ensured that flux would be present throughout the entire joint space and allow for proper solder travel.Furthermore, a functional review and visual examination of the nest, which the tube sub assembly sits into, was performed.This review revealed that the two argon access holes were clogged.Therefore, the associated preventative maintenance activities were updated to monitor the access holes and prevent a recurrence of buildup.Finally, the supplier updated the brazed joint buffing wi to note the potential failure mode of excessive buffing, which could remove too much material and weaken the joint.The device history records (dhr) were not able to be reviewed as the lot number was not available.However, all device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.Although the complaint device was not returned for analysis, prior investigations performed for similarly reported events have confirmed this failure mode.Therefore, this event likely occurred due to inadequacies in the defined production process which limited the device performance.Therefore, the most probable root cause is considered to be manufacturing related.Aesculap inc.Opened a corrective action/preventive action (capa) for further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM
Type of Device
LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, GYNECOLOGIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP INC.
3773 corporate parkway
center valley PA 18034
MDR Report Key9953660
MDR Text Key194202868
Report Number2916714-2020-00095
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NWV
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/06/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number8360-10
Device Catalogue Number8360-10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/16/2020
Initial Date FDA Received04/13/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/06/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/06/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age41 YR
-
-