• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BEDS BY GEORGE, INC. BEDS BY GEORGE; HAVEN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BEDS BY GEORGE, INC. BEDS BY GEORGE; HAVEN Back to Search Results
Model Number 3500
Device Problems Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Material Perforation (2205); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/13/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
Beds by george (bbg) was contacted by a remote technician for numotion in (b)(6).The technician was in ct but the family and the bed are in (b)(6).The family has a bbg haven canopy bed and on monday evening, the father (b)(6) noticed a tear in the foot section/panel of his daughter's bed.The tear was roughly 18" long.At this time, the family made the decision to cease using the bed until the canopy could be fixed.The next day they contacted their dealer and got in touch with remote tech in ct who they were able to discuss the issue with.This was not a live tech but a tech simply by phone.They explained the issue to him (b)(6) and sent him pictures of the tear in the fabric/mesh.He then contacted bbg and relayed this informaton at which time bbg initiated its own investigation of the issue.(b)(6) call (b)(6) back and asked him several follow up questions as to how the tear happened and how long it had been like this.Unfortunately, brad did not have answers to these questions because he had not acutally seen the bed and only spoken with the family on the phone.At this time, it was decided to have an additional 3-way call with the father to do an analysis of how the tear occured and if the patient using the bed was within the design parameters and how to provide a solution.During the 3-way call, the father was able to provide an answer that he only noticed the tear the night before and that his daughter was not aggressive, did not display aggressive behaviors like kicking or thrashing and he felt that the standard mesh should be sufficient rather than upgrade to a 'heavy duty' mesh (which would not be covered under warranty).He did say that the possible cause of the issue was his daughter rocks her bottom against the foot panel every night, but not aggressively.Bbg concluded that the standard mesh should have held up, but that the family likely needed to make sure there was not added constant pressure against the sides such as blankets or stuffed animals as there appeared to be in the picture.They also explained the importance to keep the fabric rolled and taute so this could be avoided.Lastly, it was discussed again if the family felt this would happen again and the reason for hd mesh was for situations where they feel the child exhibits behaviors that require a stonger environment.The dad did not feel this was necessary and understood that should this happen again, they would need to go to an hd mesh and it would not be covered under warranty.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BEDS BY GEORGE
Type of Device
HAVEN
Manufacturer (Section D)
BEDS BY GEORGE, INC.
219 caravan drive
elkhart, in
Manufacturer (Section G)
BEDS BY GEORGE, INC.
109 14th ave.
s building 2
middlebury, in
Manufacturer Contact
adam davis
219 caravan drive
elkhart, in 
3332310403
MDR Report Key9964613
MDR Text Key198518049
Report Number3008830652-2020-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OYS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Remedial Action Replace
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number3500
Device Catalogue Number3500
Device Lot NumberZ. COLIAS 092019
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/14/2020
Initial Date FDA Received04/15/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/04/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 YR
Patient Weight15
-
-