• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 60 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 60 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5MAXACE132-A
Device Problems Suction Problem (2170); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/17/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system ace 60 reperfusion catheter (ace60).It was reported that the patient anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician completed two successful passes in the target vessel using the ace60.Then, during the third pass, it was noticed that no thrombus was being aspirated out after some time; therefore, physician decided to remove the ace60.After the removal of the ace60, it was noticed that 5-10 centimeters from the distal end of the ace60 was ovalized.The procedure was completed using a new ace60.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the returned ace60 was ovalized at approximately 116.0 ¿ 126.0 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ace60 confirmed an ovalization on its distal shaft.If the rhv used in the procedure is not fully opened during retraction of the ace60, and subsequently, the ace60 is retracted through the rhv at an extreme angle, damage such as an ovalization may occur.During functional testing, the returned ace60 was unable to be advance through a demonstration neuron max due to the ovalization.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system ace 60 reperfusion catheter (ace60), a non-penumbra short sheath and a non-penumbra long sheath.It was reported that the patient anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician completed two successful passes in the target vessel using the ace60, short sheath and long sheath.Then, during the third pass, it was noticed that no thrombus was being aspirated out after some time; therefore, physician decided to remove the ace60.After the removal of the ace60, it was noticed that 5-10 centimeters from the distal end of the ace60 was ovalized.The procedure was completed using a new ace60, the same short sheath and the same long sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following sections are being updated based on additional information provided by the sales representative on (b)(6)2020 : section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem section e.Box 1.First name section e.Box 2.Last name h3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 60 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key9966332
MDR Text Key187938463
Report Number3005168196-2020-00559
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017426
UDI-Public00814548017426
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K160449
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,03/22/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2022
Device Model Number5MAXACE132-A
Device Catalogue Number5MAXACE132
Device Lot NumberF89930
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/07/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/22/2020
Initial Date FDA Received04/16/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/27/2020
05/31/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/02/2020
06/12/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age48 YR
-
-