|
Model Number 5MAXACE132-A |
Device Problems
Suction Problem (2170); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/17/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system ace 60 reperfusion catheter (ace60).It was reported that the patient anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician completed two successful passes in the target vessel using the ace60.Then, during the third pass, it was noticed that no thrombus was being aspirated out after some time; therefore, physician decided to remove the ace60.After the removal of the ace60, it was noticed that 5-10 centimeters from the distal end of the ace60 was ovalized.The procedure was completed using a new ace60.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: the returned ace60 was ovalized at approximately 116.0 ¿ 126.0 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ace60 confirmed an ovalization on its distal shaft.If the rhv used in the procedure is not fully opened during retraction of the ace60, and subsequently, the ace60 is retracted through the rhv at an extreme angle, damage such as an ovalization may occur.During functional testing, the returned ace60 was unable to be advance through a demonstration neuron max due to the ovalization.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system ace 60 reperfusion catheter (ace60), a non-penumbra short sheath and a non-penumbra long sheath.It was reported that the patient anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician completed two successful passes in the target vessel using the ace60, short sheath and long sheath.Then, during the third pass, it was noticed that no thrombus was being aspirated out after some time; therefore, physician decided to remove the ace60.After the removal of the ace60, it was noticed that 5-10 centimeters from the distal end of the ace60 was ovalized.The procedure was completed using a new ace60, the same short sheath and the same long sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Please note that the following sections are being updated based on additional information provided by the sales representative on (b)(6)2020 : section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem section e.Box 1.First name section e.Box 2.Last name h3 other text : placeholder.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|