• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYPOD12-A
Device Problems Break (1069); Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/17/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left internal iliac artery (iia) using pod coils, pod packing coils (pod pcs) and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, while advancing the pod coil approximately 10 centimeters into the lantern, the physician experienced resistance; therefore, the pod coil was removed and flushed.The physician then attempted to re-advance the pod coil through the lantern; however, the same issue occurred.Subsequently, 12 millimeters from the proximal end of the pusher assembly of the pod coil that had not yet advanced through the lantern stretched; therefore, the pod coil was removed.The procedure was completed using a pod coil, three pod pcs and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left internal iliac artery (iia) using pod coils, pod packing coils (pod pcs) and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, while advancing the pod coil approximately 10 centimeters into the lantern, the physician experienced resistance; therefore, the pod coil was removed and flushed.The physician then attempted to re-advance the pod coil through the lantern; however, the same issue occurred.Subsequently, 12 millimeters from the proximal end of the pusher assembly of the pod coil stretched and the pusher assembly broke outside of the patient prior to advancing through lantern.Therefore, the pod coil was removed.It was reported that the pusher assembly broke but remained intact.The procedure was completed using a pod coil, three pod pcs and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report:3005168196-2020-00562 1.Section h.Box 5.Describe event or problem, please note that the following section was inadvertently missed on the initial mfr report and is being updated on this follow-up #01 mfr report:3005168196-2020-00562 1.Section h.Box 6.Device code 3.Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.Kinks and bends were present along the length of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was fractured approximately 60.0 cm from the proximal end.The pull wire was retracted from the pusher assembly distal detachment tip (ddt).The embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly and had offset coil winds at its proximal end.The proximal constraint sphere was intact with the embolization coil.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned pod12 confirmed a pusher assembly fractured and revealed offset coil winds at the proximal end of its embolization coil.If the device is manipulated against resistance, damages such as these may occur.The lantern used in the procedure was not returned for evaluation; therefore, the root cause of the resistance was unable to be determined.Further evaluation revealed that the embolization coil was detached due to the pusher assembly fracture, and the pusher assembly was kinked and bent due to the mishandling during packaging for return.These damages were likely incidental to the complaint.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key9967700
MDR Text Key187924728
Report Number3005168196-2020-00562
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019666
UDI-Public00814548019666
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,03/24/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBYPOD12-A
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPOD12
Device Lot NumberF85451
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/08/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/24/2020
Initial Date FDA Received04/16/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/21/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/11/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-