|
|
| Catalog Number |
5959360 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
05/26/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3(manufacturer), d4(product catalog no, corporate lot no, expiry date, udi no), g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of sepramesh ip (device #1).Per op notes, "a sepramesh ip (device #1) was placed into the abdomen using tacks." (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with umbilical hernia and incisional hernia in the left lower quadrant thereby underwent repair with the implant of ventralex st mesh (device #2).Per op notes, "attention was turned to the left lower quadrant, a ventralex st (device #2) was placed into the abdominal wall.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|