• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP BARRX BARRX; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP BARRX BARRX; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Model Number 90-9100
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Chest Pain (1776); Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Laceration(s) of Esophagus (2398)
Event Date 01/22/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Title: standard versus simplified radiofrequency ablation protocol for barrett¿s esophagus: comparative analysis of the whole treatment pathway source: tan wei keith et al.Standard versus simplified¿ endoscopy international open 2020; 08: e189¿e195 date of publication: 22.01.2020.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Pli 10: according to the literature source of the study performed between january 2007 and august 2017, 5 patients developed strictures and dilations was done after the radio frequency procedure.The comparison of two rfa protocols which was 1 non label ( standard) and 1 off label ( simplified) had multiple adverse event.10 patients developed esophageal strictures following rfa (1 patient in standard group and 9 patients in simplified group), which were classified by the authors as ¿complications from rfa¿.Strictures were dilated, with a median of 1 dilation session required.2 patients required >2 dilations (1 patient required 2 dilations, 1 patient required 7 dilations).The simplified protocol was associated with 11 times greater odds of developing strictures compared to the standard protocol.Type of rfa device was not associated with risk of stricture.Of the 12 patients that needed rescue-emr, 1 patient developed a stricture.2 patients treated with the standard protocol had serious adverse events as judged by the authors.1 patient had symptomatic atrial fibrillation within 36hr of two ablation sessions (1 circumferential and 1 focal) and needed pharmacological cardioversion.1 patient had severe chest pain and dysphagia within 48hr of rfa and was admitted, but this was not related to esophageal stricture and was managed with analgesia and iv fluids.1 patient treated with the simplified protocol had a serious adverse event.There was no evidence of active bleeding and the patient was observed for 24hr before being discharged.Article: standard versus simplified radiofrequency ablation protocol for barrett¿s esophagus: comparative analysis of the whole treatment pathway author: wei keith tan published online: 2020-01-22.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARRX
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP BARRX
covidien gi solutions
sunnyvale CA 94085 4022
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP BARRX
covidien gi solutions
sunnyvale CA 94085 4022
Manufacturer Contact
amy beeman
161 cheshire lane, suite 100
plymouth, MN 55441
7632104064
MDR Report Key10017031
MDR Text Key194535235
Report Number3004904811-2020-00010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier10884521189362
UDI-Public10884521189362
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K093008
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/01/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/01/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number90-9100
Device Catalogue Number90-9100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/16/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-