CORDIS CASHEL AVIATOR PLUS .014 7.0X40 142CM; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 4247040W |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 04/06/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
During use of.014 7.0 x 40 142cm aviator plus balloon catheter (bc) was deflated and attempted to be removed from the sheath however, it could not be removed from the sheath and the shaft got separated.The procedure was completed because there was no problem.There was no reported patient injury.This was vascular access intervention therapy (vaivt) case.The lesion was the stenosis just above the anastomosis.Arterial approached was made.The separation occurred at the outlet of the sheath, and the rest was inside the sheath and could be removed.The sheath was reinserted, and final imaging was performed to check for any residue.Additional procedural information was requested but is unknown.The device was not returned for analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 17718330 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿body/shaft separated - in-patient¿ and ¿ pta/ptca system withdrawal difficulty - through guide/sheath¿ could not be confirmed as the device was not returned for analysis.The exact cause could not be determined.It is likely handling of the device and procedural factors contributed to the event reported.However, without the return of the device for analysis it is difficult to draw a clinical conclusion between the device and the event reported.According to the instructions for use, although this is not intended as a mitigation, ¿prior to use, the device should be examined to verify functionality and integrity, and ensure that its size is suitable for the specific procedure.To reduce the potential for vessel damage or the risk of dislodgement of particles it is very important that the inflated diameter of the balloon should approximate the diameter of the vessel just proximal and distal to the lesion.The balloon dimensions are printed on the product label and hub identification band.The compliance table printed on the box label and packaged with the product illustrates how the balloon diameter increases with increasing pressure.Do not retract the catheter unless the balloon is fully deflated under vacuum.If resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event.Therefore, no corrective or preventive action will be taken at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
During use of.014 7.0x40 142cm aviator plus balloon catheter (bc) was deflated and attempted to be removed from the sheath however, it could not be removed from the sheath and the shaft got separated.The procedure was completed because there was no problem.There was no reported patient injury.This was vascular access intervention therapy (vaivt) case.The lesion was the stenosis just above the anastomosis.Arterial approached was made.The separation occurred at the outlet of the sheath, and the rest was inside the sheath and could be removed.The sheath was reinserted, and final imaging was performed to check for any residue.The device will be returned for analysis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
After further review of additional information received the following sections have been updated accordingly: d10, g4, g7, h1, h2, h3 and h6.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
During use of.014 7.0 x 40 142cm aviator plus balloon catheter (bc) was deflated and attempted to be removed from the sheath however, it could not be removed from the sheath and the shaft got separated.The procedure was completed because there was no problem.There was no reported patient injury.This was vascular access intervention therapy (vaivt) case.The lesion was the stenosis just above the anastomosis.Arterial approached was made.The separation occurred at the outlet of the sheath, and the rest was inside the sheath and could be removed.The sheath was reinserted, and final imaging was performed to check for any residue.Additional procedural information was requested but is unknown.One product was returned for analysis.A non-sterile aviator plus.014 7.0 x 40 142cm was received for analysis coiled inside a plastic bag.Per visual analysis, the balloon was observed separated near the proximal seal area of the balloon.Also, blood residues were observed inside the balloon.No other anomalies were observed.Per sem analysis on the separated balloon observed during visual review, results revealed that the balloon separation/burst was caused by a rupture on the balloon surface.Elongations were observed adjacent to the balloon rupture of the balloon.Elongations are commonly associated with separations caused by material tensile overload.Therefore, it is assumed that the balloon catheter was induced to an excessive tensile force that exceeded the material yield strength prior to the separation.No other anomalies were observed during sem analysis.Functional analysis was not possible due to the separated condition of the balloon, as received.A dimensional analysis was performed to verify the correct od at the proximal balloon seal.The measurement and result were found within specification.A product history record (phr) review of lot 17718330 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿body/shaft separated - in-patient¿ was not confirmed since it was the balloon adjacent to the proximal seal area that was separated, not the body/shaft as initially reported by the customer.Furthermore, the reported ¿pta/ptca system withdrawal difficulty - through guide/sheath¿ was not confirmed due to the separated condition on the balloon, as received.Also, dimensional analysis was performed to verify the od of the balloon¿s proximal seal and the result was found within specification.The exact causes could not be determined.A secondary failure of ¿balloon separated - in-patient¿ was confirmed during device analysis as the balloon was received separated near the proximal seal area of the balloon.Per sem analysis, the balloon separation/burst was caused by a rupture on the balloon surface; additionally, elongations were observed adjacent to the balloon rupture.It is likely vessel characteristics, handling of the device, and procedural factors contributed to the event reported.The vessel was described as being stenosed, balloon material may have been damaged when attempting to cross the stenosed lesion.After rupture of the balloon, it is likely difficulty was experienced upon removal and forceful measures were taken to remove the device.Per device analysis, it is presumed the balloon catheter was induced to an excessive tensile force that exceeded the material yield strength prior to the separation.According to the instructions for use, although this is not intended as a mitigation, ¿prior to use, the device should be examined to verify functionality and integrity, and ensure that its size is suitable for the specific procedure.To reduce the potential for vessel damage or the risk of dislodgement of particles it is very important that the inflated diameter of the balloon should approximate the diameter of the vessel just proximal and distal to the lesion.The balloon dimensions are printed on the product label and hub identification band.The compliance table printed on the box label and packaged with the product illustrates how the balloon diameter increases with increasing pressure.Do not retract the catheter unless the balloon is fully deflated under vacuum.If resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Caution: if strong resistance is met during advancement or withdrawal of the balloon catheter, discontinue movement and determine the cause of resistance before proceeding.If the cause of resistance cannot be determined, withdraw the entire system.Note: if the balloon cannot be withdrawn through the guiding catheter, withdraw the balloon catheter and guiding catheter as a single unit.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event.Therefore, no corrective or preventive action will be taken at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
During use of.014 7.0x40 142cm aviator plus balloon catheter (bc) was deflated and attempted to be removed from the sheath however, it could not be removed from the sheath and the shaft got separated.The procedure was completed because there was no problem.There was no reported patient injury.This was vascular access intervention therapy (vaivt) case.The lesion was the stenosis just above the anastomosis.Arterial approached was made.The separation occurred at the outlet of the sheath, and the rest was inside the sheath and could be removed.The sheath was reinserted, and final imaging was performed to check for any residue.During the product evaluation, the balloon was observed separated near the proximal seal area of the balloon.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|