• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PRESHAPED PROWLER10 45TIP 2MRK; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PRESHAPED PROWLER10 45TIP 2MRK; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number 606-051FX
Device Problem Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage, Subarachnoid (1893)
Event Date 02/28/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Based on additional information received on 15-apr-2020, the complaint meets regulatory reporting criteria.(b)(6).Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.The product has been returned for evaluation and testing; however, the engineering evaluation has not been completed.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event Description
A report from the field indicated that shortly before a 2x4 hypersoft (microvention) coil was completely inside the aneurysm and about to be detached, the coil could neither be pushed nor pulled.The prowler10 45tip 2mrk (606051fx/17751954) pre-shaped microcatheter was ¿stretched so the coil torn through¿.The coil was damaged ¿at the joint between the coil itself and the pusher wire¿.Part of the coil remained in the catheter and the rest of the coil in the patient.The ¿stretched¿ coil was ¿catched¿ in the long sheath using a stent retriever.There was no report of adverse outcome to the patient.A 3x10 hypersoft (microvention) coil was used prior to the complaint coil and there were no issues encountered during advancement or detachment.The microcatheter had not been re-shaped after removal from the packaging and the device had not been inserted through a stopcock instead of a hemostasis valve.The physician did not have ¿any problems while probing the vessels with microwire and microcatheter¿.The complaint microcatheter and part of the 2x4 hypersoft coil will be returned for evaluation.No further information was provided.Additional information received on 05-may-2020 indicated that the target aneurysm was located at the anterior communicating artery.Reportedly, there was an adequate and continuous flush maintained through the devices and excessive force was not applied at any time.The procedure was completed with ¿aneurysm remainder (rest) with coil in the carrier vessel¿.The patient experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage (hunt & hess grade 1), but the exact timing in relation to the reported event was not reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #: (b)(4).A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: a report from the field indicated that shortly before a 2x4 hypersoft (microvention) coil was completely inside the aneurysm and about to be detached, the coil could neither be pushed nor pulled.The prowler10 45tip 2mrk (606051fx/17751954) pre-shaped microcatheter was ¿stretched so the coil torn through¿.The coil was damaged ¿at the joint between the coil itself and the pusher wire¿.Part of the coil remained in the catheter and the rest of the coil in the patient.The ¿stretched¿ coil was ¿catched¿ in the long sheath using a stent retriever.There was no report of adverse outcome to the patient.A 3x10 hypersoft (microvention) coil was used prior to the complaint coil and there were no issues encountered during advancement or detachment.The microcatheter had not been re-shaped after removal from the packaging and the device had not been inserted through a stopcock instead of a hemostasis valve.The physician did not have ¿any problems while probing the vessels with microwire and microcatheter¿.Additional information received on 05-may-2020 indicated that the target aneurysm was located at the anterior communicating artery.Reportedly, there was an adequate and continuous flush maintained through the devices and excessive force was not applied at any time.The procedure was completed with ¿aneurysm remainder (rest) with coil in the carrier vessel¿.The patient experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage (hunt & hess grade 1), but the exact timing in relation to the reported event was not reported.No further information was provided.One non-sterile preshaped prowler10 45tip 2mrk unit was received inside of a pouch.The device was visually inspected, the body of the device was found with several kinks and compressed, also a slightly curvy condition could be noted.Then a microscopic inspection was performed, and an unknown coil was found protruding from the distal tip of the device no other damages were observed.The id and od from the micro-catheter were measured and were found within specification.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 17751954 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified the complaint reported by the customer ¿catheter (body/shaft)¿ unraveled/stretched¿ was not able to be confirmed.The stretched condition was not found on the device.The complaint reported by the customer ¿catheter (body/shaft)¿ obstructed-in patient with loss of mc cerebral target position¿ could not be evaluated because it is specific to the patient and procedure at the time of occurrence and cannot be replicated in the lab.However, the compressed condition may have contributed to the failure since the coil was found stuck inside in this section, the damage of compression may have been caused by use of excessive force and handling in the device and because of this we can confirm the complaint.Neither the analysis nor the mre suggest that the failure reported could be related to the manufacturing process.Catheter obstructed and unraveled/stretched necessitating additional intervention and subarachnoid hemorrhage are known potential complications associated with the prowler microcatheter.Per the prowler microcatheter instructions for use (ifu), if strong resistance is met during manipulation, discontinue the procedure and determine the cause of resistance before proceeding.If the cause of resistance cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter and guidewire as a system.The root cause of the event cannot be determined based on the information available for review; however, according to the microplex coil system (mcs) (hypersoft 3d complex) ifu, the mcs should be delivered with a wire-reinforced microcatheter with the specified minimum internal diameter (id) of 0.0165¿.The labeled id of the prowler10 is 0.015¿.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive; however, it appears that circumstances of the procedure may have contributed rather than the design or manufacture of the device.The file will be re-reviewed if additional information is received at a later date.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the events were related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRESHAPED PROWLER10 45TIP 2MRK
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
MDR Report Key10028646
MDR Text Key194623116
Report Number3008114965-2020-00158
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
UDI-Device Identifier10886704028529
UDI-Public10886704028529
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K003925
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/02/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/06/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2020
Device Model Number606-051FX
Device Catalogue Number606051FX
Device Lot Number17751954
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/04/2020
Date Manufacturer Received05/13/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
2MM X 4CM HYPERSOFT COIL (MICROVENTION); 3X10 HYPERSOFT (MICROVENTION)
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-