In a literature article entitled, "transscleral sutureless intraocular lens versus retro pupillary iris-claw lens fixation for pediatric aphakia without capsular support: a randomized study," comparisons were made between sutureless transscleral intraocular lens (iol) fixation to retropupillary iris-claw lens implantation in cases of paediatric aphakia without capsular support.Both techniques yielded comparable visual outcomes.The manufacturer's iol was used for the transscleral fixated intraocular lens (iol) and a competitor's lens was the iris-claw lens.The manufacturer's lens was implanted into 15 eyes of 11 patients; 7 female and 4 male.During surgery, one eye had a broken iol haptic during exteriorization which required another iol to be implanted instead.Postoperative complications included: 2 eyes had iol decentration, 1 eye had inflammatory membrane causing a decrease in bcva by 0.15, 1 eye had a yag laser capsulotomy, 1 eye developed postoperative hypotony (iop < 6 mmhg) due to subconjunctival leakage at the sclerotomy site around the haptic, which resolved spontaneously after 2 weeks.2 eyes developed ocular hypertension, 10 months and 1 year postoperatively, and were managed medically, 3 eyes had subconjunctival exposure of the iol haptic, without conjunctival erosion and 1 eye developed optic capture 6 months postoperatively, which resolved after pupillary dilation by mydriatic drops.It was also reported that in the sutureless transscleral iol fixation group endothelial cell counts were decreased on the average by 14% at a six month postoperative measurement.
|