|
The device was not returned to numed for review so the balloon burst cannot be confirmed.A review of the device history records was performed and no issues were noted.There are no other complaints associated with this lot number.A review of the balloon material used shows there are no other complaints associated with the balloon material lot number used.This device was being used off-label for an unapproved use.This device is only approved for percutaneous transluminal valvuloplasty of the pulmonary valve.It was being used in the aortic valve.As per the instructions for use, an inflation device with pressure gauge should be used on the device to monitor pressure.In this case, an inflation device with pressure gauge was not used.A syringe was used which does not allow you to monitor the pressure being added to the balloon, so it is unknown as to what pressure the balloon was taken to, and what pressure the balloon burst.In the report from the user facility, they state that they believe the balloon burst was caused by either a "sharp calcific edge from the aortic valve and/or being inflated adjacent to the crimped undeployed valve cage loaded on its delivery system".A comparative catheter was pulled and tested for rated burst pressure.It was the same catalog number / size as the complaint catheter, but a different lot number.The balloon was immersed in a body temperature water bath and inflated until it burst.The catheter did not burst until 3.5 atm, which is well above the labeled rated burst pressure of 2.0 atm.
|
|
Per the report from the medwatch form / distributor - the balloon was hand inflated nominal size (18mm) using a vac-lok locking syringe.After reaching its nominal size using fluoroscopy, the balloon ruptured.Physician immediately pulled a negative pressure on the vac-lok's plunger and locked it.Blood observed returning from the balloon port (which is supposed to be a closed system).The balloon was withdrawn from the patient with vac-lok plunger locked on negative.There were ekg changes after balloon rupturing.Concern if there may have been some air/micro-bubbles dispursed during the balloon rupturing.The balloon ruptured from either a sharp calcific edge from the aortic valve and/or being inflated adjacent to the "crimped" undeployed valve cage loaded on its delivery system may have ruptured the balloon.Once removed it was confirmed the balloon ruptured.Procedure completed.No harm to patient.4/24/2020: in a conversation with the bis sales specialist and the account: a 9fr sheath was used.The catheter shaft was not kinked.The balloon was removed and replaced with a marker pigtail.The removed balloon was intact, no missing parts.
|