|
The reported event could be confirmed as the device was returned for evaluation and matches the alleged failure.The device inspection revealed the following: all the three screws received were found to be broken from the proximal section just below the head.The threads were absolutely splayed.The overall shafts were found to be distorted and bent.Most likely due to overloading right after the surgery, a few weeks later, the head of the screws broke in a brittle manner.Sign of fatigue fracture was not evident.The deformation observed on the threads are most likely due to overloading, but it is possible that more damage was caused to them during explantation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.A couple of x-rays were provided which were presented to our medical expert for his opinion, with the other very limited available info: ¿to give a sound answer usually lateral x-rays would be necessary to evaluate the total correction given with this osteotomy.¿ ¿the patient was treated for a medially located arthrosis to make the varus knee into a valgus and put the load on the intact lateral knee joint.This is obviously the indication.As there is a lack of the height and weight of the patient we cannot say whether obesity has contributed to the failure of the screws.However, with the technique of the open wedge it has to be in mind, that the integration of the bone into the wedge takes longer in an elder patient and that the loads, when weight bearing is allowed again, may put on the plate as there-like in the given case-has been no consolidation so far.¿ ¿the wedge has to be incorporated into the bone until it is completely grown in.That may take longer, then with a normal fracture or with a simple cut through the bone, as the piece of bone does not have any metabolism without sufficient vascular supply.The plate will be much more heavily loaded as with a normal fracture.¿ ¿the most proximal screw looks loosened already on the first postoperative image.If that is true the load was taken by only two screws and the therefore they were under dimensioned for the expected load.¿ based on the above investigation and the medical expert¿s opinion, it can be ascertained that the predominant factor for failure was patient related.The device received shows clear signs of overloading, which becomes more critical in case of an open wedge osteotomy, as integration of a bone into the wedge takes longer than a normal fracture in elderly patients.As in this case, no consolidation was achieved therefore the plate was more heavily loaded than as with a normal fracture.Load eventually got transferred to the head of the screws which were least supported, hence they broke.If any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|