|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-aug-2010) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10 note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on or about (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of composix l/p mesh.Per op notes, ¿the hernia defect was noted and reduced.The prior synthetic mesh was noted and excised entirely.A composix l/p mesh was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with infected mesh, bowel obstruction and recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with excision of composix l/p mesh and implant of biological mesh.Per op notes, ¿the old scar tissue was excised.The mesh was adherent to the surrounding tissue and bowel were taken down.The mesh was dissected from the tissues.The prior mesh was densely adherent to the small bowel.Loop of small bowel stuck in the mesh was taken down.All the adhesions were lysed.The prior mesh was dissected from the bowel and excised.The serosal injury was repaired with sutures.The hernia sac was identified and reduced.A biological mesh was placed and sutured.¿.
|