|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with chronic incisional pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix l/p mesh.Per operative notes, ¿a composix l/p mesh was placed into the anterior abdominal wall using a tacker.¿ (b)(6) 2010 - patient had refractory right lower quadrant abdominal pain thereby underwent laparoscopic lysis of adhesions.Per operative notes, ¿adhesions were lysed.The appendix at its base was transected and removed it from the abdomen.¿.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct brand name and pma/510(k) #.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-aug-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date) g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: d.1 (brand name), g.4 (pma/510(k) #).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|