|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Procode: krd/hcg initial reporter phone - (b)(6).A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.The product is available for evaluation and testing; however, it has not been received to date.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.Photo analysis.The photos provided of the cash 14 cere 4mmx8.0cm were not able to be evaluated since the device could not be appreciated clearly.Further investigation will be performed once the device returns for analysis.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device s14699 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.
|
|
As reported by the field, during a percutaneous intracranial aneurysm embolization coil embolization, a 4mmx8.0cm cash 14 cere coil (crc14040830, s14699) couldn¿t be detached.The physician withdrew the problem coil outside of the patient and changed it for another new coil to complete the procedure.The target cerebral position was not lost.There was no patient injury reported.Images were provided.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Updated sections on this report: d10, g4, g7, h2, h3, h6, and h10.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, during a percutaneous intracranial aneurysm embolization coil embolization, a 4mmx8.0cm cash 14 cere coil (crc14040830, s14699) couldn¿t be detached.The physician withdrew the problem coil outside of the patient and changed it for another new coil to complete the procedure.The target cerebral position was not lost.There was no patient injury reported.No additional information is available.One non-sterile cash 14 cere 4mmx8.0cm unit was received inside of a pouch.The received device was visually inspected, and the core wire was found damaged, a hole was found on the outer sheath also biological material could me observed inside the device and in contact with the dpu.Then a microscopic inspection was performed, and the distal outer sheath had not been softened indicating that the resistance heating coil had not been heated and the detachment process was not initiated.No other damages were observed.The resistance of the device was measured with multimeter and a lab sample enpower control cable.Resistance initially measured approximately 0 o, which it showed loss of electrical continuity.Also, the device was connected to detachment control box dcb00000500 (dcb) with an enpower control cable lab sample and the power was turned on.The system ready light was not illuminating.Due to these conditions, the detach cycle could not be performed.The complaint reported by the customer ¿coil - failure to detach¿ was confirmed, due the detachment cycle could not be performed due a loss of electrical continuity.The core wire was found damaged, a hole can be observed at the outer sheath which could have been caused by an external force, the same force may damage the core wire of the device contributing to the lack of resistance values on the multimeter.Residues of biological material and saline solution could also be observed inside the outer sheath and in contact with the dpu wires, which it seems to be entered into the device from the hole located at the outer sheath which may contribute as well to the device failure.Neither the analysis nor the mre suggest that the failure reported could be related to the manufacturing process.Procedural factors and handling process may contribute to the failure as reported.Failure to detach is a known potential issue associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) contains several precautions related to this issue and includes instructions for troubleshooting the situation should it be encountered during use.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and the evidence presented by the returned device; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation and device interaction, may have contributed to the reported failure and damages on the returned system.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|