|
The pipeline flex pusher was found broken into two segments at ~107.0cm from the proximal end.The pipeline flex pusher was found protruding from within the phenom 27 catheter hub with the distal hypotube stretched.No damage was found with the phenom 27 catheter hub.No bends or kinks were found with the phenom 27 catheter body.No damage was found with the phenom 27 distal marker/tip.The phenom 27 catheter total length was measured to be ~158.5cm and the useable length was measured to be ~152.1cm.The pipeline flex pusher was removed from within the phenom 27 catheter hub with resistance.The pipeline flex distal hypotube was found stretched.The ptfe shrink tubing was intact but pulled back from the proximal bumper.The proximal bumper, re-sheathing pad and re-sheathing marker were found intact.No breaks or separations were found with the distal pushwire.However, the ptfe sleeves, proximal and distal restraints, and tip coil were found dislodged from the distal pushwire.An in-house 0.026¿ mandrel was inserted through the phenom 27 catheter and the ptfe sleeves, proximal restraint, tip coil and braid were pushed out from within the catheter lumen.The distal restraint was likely lost during analysis.The tip coil was found stretched and damaged.The proximal and distal ends of the braid were found damaged and not open.It is likely some damage occurred to the tip coil and distal end of the braid during removal from within the phenom 27 catheter.No other anomalies were observed.The broken pipeline flex pusher was sent out for sem (scanning electron micrographic) analysis.Based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿ s report of ¿failure/incomplete open distal¿ could not be confirmed based on device evaluation, as the device has been fully deployed and re-sheathed.In addition, no images were provided for review.Failure to open can be caused by patient vessel tortuosity, damaged braid, braid improperly sized to anatomy, braid was overstretched during delivery, user deploys braid in vessel bend, presence of other indwelling endovascular stents, or inappropriate anatomy.However, the cause could not be determined.Regarding the broken pusher, per the sem analysis report, the outer wire failed via torsional overload.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|