• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number NV-2-8-HELIX
Medical Device Problem Code Separation Failure (2547)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Date of Event 04/27/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received information regarding a concerto coil that did not detach in the blood vessel.It was reported that the device was prepared and procedure was being done per manufacturer instructions for use.The surgeon judge that the product could not be used.The coil was replaced and the procedure was then able to be completed with no further issue.There was no harm or injury to the patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received from a healthcare provider (hcp), via a manufacturing representative (rep), indicated the coil would not detach in the vessel.The procedure was completed successfully using medtronic products.Other detailed information was unknown: vessel tortuosity, the number of detachment attempts, any device damage observed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Facility information updated in english.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The concerto implant coil was returned without introducer sheath.The pusher was found to be kinked at ~6.2cm, broken at break indicator but retained by release wire, bent at ~104.0cm and kinked at ~154.3cm from proximal end.This is indicative of manual detachment attempts at these locations.The coin was found retracted from the lumen stop.The shield coil was found intact with the implant coil already detached and returned for analysis.Under microscope, the jacket was removed to gain access to the lumen stop.The lumen stop and the retainer ring were found to be visually acceptable.The implant coil was returned and found to be damaged.No other anomalies were observed.Based on the analysis performed, the customer report of ¿non-detachment¿ could not be confirmed as the pusher was returned with the implant coil already detached.There was evidence of manual detachment attempts and the coin was retracted from the lumen stop, releasing the implant coil as intended.Based on the returned device, the pushwire was found broken and kinked in the distal section of the pusher, indicative of either high tortuosity, attempted device advancement against resistance, damage during use or during return shipping to medtronic for analysis.It is possible that the damage to the pusher contributed towards the no n-detachment by restricting the movement of the release wire during detachment attempt.There was no indication that the event is related to a manufacturing issue, therefore a dhr review is not required.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO NYLON
Common Device Name
DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key10096921
Report Number2029214-2020-00500
Device Sequence Number3342447
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536013346
UDI-Public00847536013346
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
PMA/510(K) Number
K090046
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/10/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/23/2022
Device Model NumberNV-2-8-HELIX
Device Catalogue NumberNV-2-8-HELIX
Device Lot NumberA820223
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/23/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/25/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/31/2020
06/25/2020
08/06/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/28/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/08/2020
07/02/2020
08/10/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-