|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with umbilical hernia and incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventrio st mesh (device #1).Per op notes, ¿the omentum was dissected off the umbilicus.A round ventrio st mesh (device #1) was placed intracorporeally and tacked circumferentially using sorbafix.¿ (b)(6) 2020 -patient had right lower quadrant pain and diagnosed with bilateral indirect inguinal hernia, adhesion thereby underwent robotic repair with the implant of 3dmax light mesh (device #2, #3).Per op notes, ¿patient was noted to have adhesions in the periumbilical area related to previously placed mesh (device #1) were taken down.Bilateral inguinal hernias were noted and 3dmax light mesh (device #2, #3) was placed to defect bilaterally and tacked.¿.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name and 510k number.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: d1 (brand name), g4 (510k number).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|