| Model Number |
8900 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/23/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a tip detachment occurred.A fractional flow reserve (ffr) procedure was being performed.Vascular access was obtained via the right radial artery.This comet pressure guidewire was selected and ffr was successfully performed in the right coronary artery.They attempted to perform another diagnosis in the left anterior descending artery; however, there was difficulty crossing the very narrow and tortuous lesion.Once they were able to cross the lesion they noticed that the signal was lost and measurements were unable to be completed.During withdrawal they noticed that a separation occurred inside the sleeve approximately 3cm from the distal tip.They managed to retrieve the complete length of the wire from the patient.It was noted that the device became kinked as some point during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patients status is perfect.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a tip detachment occurred.A fractional flow reserve (ffr) procedure was being performed.Vascular access was obtained via the right radial artery.This comet pressure guidewire was selected and ffr was successfully performed in the right coronary artery.They attempted to perform another diagnosis in the left anterior descending artery; however, there was difficulty crossing the very narrow and tortuous lesion.Once they were able to cross the lesion they noticed that the signal was lost and measurements were unable to be completed.During withdrawal they noticed that a separation occurred inside the sleeve approximately 3cm from the distal tip.They managed to retrieve the complete length of the wire from the patient.It was noted that the device became kinked as some point during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patients status is perfect.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluated by mfr:the shaft of the returned device was visually and microscopically inspected for damage.The device showed a separation located 3cm from the tip.The total wire (185cm) was returned and accounted for.Functionality of the device could not be confirmed due to the damage of the device.The coefficient was confirmed to be programmed per specification.The device showed kinks and bends throughout the wire length.A scanning electron microscopy examination was performed which identified distal end failure, post failure damage, striations, and dimpling at the center support.The proximal end identified post failure damage, striations, and a raised center line.This type of damage may have been caused by reverse bending fatigue with possible ductile overload which is indicative of failures in the slotted tube region.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The complaint of device separation was confirmed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|