MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRIO MESH; SURGICAL MESH

Catalog Number	0010216
Medical Device Problem Codes	Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Date of Event	09/08/2016
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against ventrio patch.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against ventrio patch.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incarcerated midline incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the infarcted omentum was excised.A ventrio mesh was placed to the abdominal wall using absorbable tacks.¿ on (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia, small bowel obstruction thereby underwent open repair with removal of ventrio mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the adhesions were taken down.The ventrio mesh was removed.A synthetic mesh was placed in the retrorectus space and secured.¿.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against ventrio patch.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incarcerated midline incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿the infarcted omentum was excised.A piece of ventrio mesh (device #1) was placed to epigastric midline using absorbable tacks.¿ (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia, small bowel obstruction thereby underwent open repair with removal of ventrio mesh (device #1) and implant of bard soft mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the adhesions were taken down.The ventrio mesh (device #1) was removed.The bowel was kiniking at site of obstruction.A synthetic mesh and bard soft mesh (device #2) was placed in the retrorectus space and secured using sutures.¿.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.

• Brand Name: VENTRIO MESH
• Common Device Name: SURGICAL MESH
• Manufacturer (Section D): DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick RI 02886
• Manufacturer (Section G): BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544; san geronimo industrial park; lot #1, road #3, km 79.7; humacao PR 00791
• Manufacturer Contact: andrew topoulos ; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick, RI 02886 ; 4018258495
• MDR Report Key: 10122018
• Report Number: 1213643-2020-05393
• Device Sequence Number: 2851251
• Product Code: FTL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741016431
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741016431(17)160928(10)HUXI0901
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: MO
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K100229
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2014
• Device Explanted Year: 2016
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Consumer
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 08/12/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 09/28/2016
• Device Catalogue Number: 0010216
• Device Lot Number: HUXI0901
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 05/28/2020
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 07/09/2025; 07/28/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 06/05/2020
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 07/28/2025; 08/12/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 09/15/2013
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 55 YR
• Patient Sex: Male
• Patient Weight: 147 KG