• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 COMPOSIX MESH E/X; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 COMPOSIX MESH E/X; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0123810
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Abdominal Pain (1685); Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
Date of Event 12/01/2008
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix e/x on (b)(6) 2006.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix e/x.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix e/x on (b)(6) 2006.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix e/x.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2006 - patient was diagnosed with large incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of composix e/x mesh.Per op notes, ¿a composix e/x mesh was placed in the intraabdominal cavity using sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2008 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia and abdominal pain thereby underwent laparoscopic extensive lysis of adhesions.On (b)(6) 2008 - patient was diagnosed with large ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per op notes, ¿patient has a recurrent hernia that causing pain.There was noted to be a large piece of old mesh that had been rolled up upon itself with multiple tacks within the mesh.This was also excised.Then placed a alloderm around the fascial edges using prolene sutures.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3 (manufacturer), d4(product catalog no., udi no.), d.6b, g1, g3, g6, h2, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMPOSIX MESH E/X
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key10122032
Report Number1213643-2020-05404
Device Sequence Number14184130
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031212
UDI-Public(01)00801741031212
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K002684
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2006
Device Explanted Year2008
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0123810
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/29/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/04/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/05/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age38 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-