| Model Number |
SERB65-09-80-80 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fracture (1260); Premature Activation (1484); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
06/02/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Physician intended to use a protege gps self-expanding stent system with a 6fr non-medtronic sheath and 0.035 non-medtronic guidewire during treatment of a soft tissue, 80mm cto (chronic total occlusion-100%) in the patient¿s mid left common iliac artery of diameter 8mm.Slight vessel tortuosity is reported.No damage was noted to the product packaging prior to use.No issues noted when removing the device from the packaging.Ifu was followed and the device was prepped without issue.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device was not passed through a previously deployed stent and no resistance was noted during advancement.It is reported deployment difficulties were noted.No damage was noted to the deployment mechanisms or device handle prior to deployment issue.The lock-pin had been removed prior to attempted deployment.A partial deployment is reported.Two kissing non-medtronic balloon expandable stents were deployed and the protege gps stent was retracted to the bifurcation with half in the left iliac and half in the right.The 2 kissing stents were placed through the interstices of the stent.No patient injury reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: there was not additional treatment given to the patient and there are no plans to remove the protege gps stent.No vessel damage occurred.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Image review: three photographs of procedural cine images were received to medtronic investigation lab for evaluation.The first image is of the protégé gps being implanted in the patient¿s left mid left common iliac artery.The 80mm length stent is in the process of being deployed.Approximately one third of the stent is flowered within the targeted vessel anatomy.It is noted that approximately four compressed stent strut rows are still within the distal end of the 6 fr support sheath at the top of the image at the ostium of the iliac artery.The proximal end of the stent is still engaged with the retainer.In the second image the 80mm length stent exhibits stent cell strut row elongation and possible stent fracturing within the arch.The stent has been stretched over the arch and is also deployed in the ostium of the right iliac artery.A guide wire and non-medtronic balloon expandable stent have been threaded through the interstices of the stent and into the left iliac artery.In the third and the non-medtronic balloon expandable stents were implanted within the 80mm length stent in the patient¿s right and left common iliac arteries.The non-medtronic stents overlap beyond the ends of the 80mm length stent and no individual stent bridging struts appear in the area of the arch.The absence of individual stent bridging struts within the area of the arch indicates that the 80mm length stent was fractured during the implant procedure.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|