| Model Number |
241-02-102 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
05/11/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as dislocation.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred on the same day.Initial and prolonged hospitalization was required.The healthcare professional indicated there was a significant adverse event to the patient.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable devices were available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to dislocation.There were no findings during this evaluation indicate the reported devices were defective.No other information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revision surgery - patient received a primary total knee arthroplasty with a size 2 femur and 2 x 12 insert.Patient kept dislocating and became 10-15 degree hyper-extended upon discharge.Surgeon went back in and revised with a posterior stabilized femur and insert the same day as initial surgery for better stability.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|